![]() Sure, the D40x shares the same name, but it was targeted more towards the advanced beginner, whereas the D40 was more for the absolute beginner. How was it that Nikon could possibly release an upgrade for a camera that was out for less than five months? People world-wide yelled, “what the?” and for good reason. Indeed, it was a performance camera, regardless of it’s price.įast forward to this past March, when Nikon announced their follow-up, the D40x, which we are taking a look at today. ![]() Despite its ‘value’ moniker, it was equipped with a 6.1 megapixel sensor capable of 2.5FPS for up to 100 shots of JPEG fine. What it brought to the table was a smaller frame, in effect becoming more lightweight than the D50 and other Nikon D-SLRs. So the D40 came and had a certain amount of success, although I am not sure about exact numbers. However, a few of the pluses on the D40 made many D50-owners consider an “upgrade”. Though both cameras had comparable sensors, the D50 was a larger camera, and more comfortable to use overall. ![]() ![]() The D40 was set out to replace the D50, but not replace it at the same time. Last November, Nikon made an announcement that both delighted some and confused many. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |